Daniel Siniakov vs Nick Hardt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Hardt has a slight edge with 42.25% of points won on their second serve in recent form, compared to Siniakov's 42.09%.
• Return Game Advantage: Siniakov excels in return games, winning 50.91% of opponent's second serve points, while Hardt claims 45.07%.
• Breakpoint Resilience: Siniakov has a higher breakpoint save rate at 54.13%, surpassing Hardt's 51.42%.
• Performance Overview: Over the past year, Siniakov boasts a stronger match win rate at 64.71%, compared to Hardt's 48.72%.
• Surface Strength: Siniakov is dominant on hard courts with a 63% win rate. In contrast, Hardt is more successful on clay with a 61% win percentage.
• Level of Opposition: Siniakov has faced tougher competitors, with an average opponent rank of 216.21, while Hardt's is 272.33.
• Direct H2H Record: Hardt leads their head-to-head matchup with one victory over Siniakov in their single encounter, winning both sets they played.
• Decisive Set Ability: If this match extends to a deciding set, Siniakov holds an advantage with a 56% win rate, significantly better than Hardt's 18%.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Hardt has a slight edge in break point opportunities, converting at 37.88% versus Siniakov's 36.47%.
• Tiebreak Situations: The only tiebreak in their previous encounter was claimed by Hardt, giving him confidence in extreme pressure situations.
• Does Hardt's past win in a head-to-head match suggest he has a psychological advantage over Siniakov?
• Answer: Possibly, as previous victories can boost confidence and provide strategic insights.

Editorial Prediction (July 11, 2025, UTC):

As we look forward to the upcoming match, key factors such as previous head-to-head victory, current performance stats, and specific strengths come into focus.

Siniakov's high win percentage over the last year and ability to face higher-ranked opponents with success mark him as a formidable competitor. His skills on hard courts and prowess in return games add to his strengths.

However, Hardt's past head-to-head success over Siniakov, particularly in a tiebreak, gives him a psychological advantage and confidence boost for this encounter.

While Hardt holds a small edge in transforming break point opportunities, Siniakov has shown better breakpoint resilience and decisive set performances recently.

Factoring in all elements, including past performances and current forms, the slight advantage tilts towards Siniakov as the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.